OverviewFilesCommitsIssuesDocsReleasesPeers

opencog-learn commits / 20e59b8

Claude is cooking my brain. This is wrong.
The notional abuse being perptrated by Claude is really not helping. It uses almost all the words correctly in almost every way, but then does sneaky stuff. The formulas it gets in the end I think are correct, because I think it is just copying them from reference texts. But there are some low-down dirty notational tricks in here, its doing a wordcel on me when it should be shape-rotating. Bust since it can't shape-rotate, it is fucking fudging the calulations. How much personal time do I want to devote to untangling this mess?
20e59b8d8d5b018f8ec9b7cb6bca169ddb9b25fe
by Linas Vepštas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> · 2026-01-27T23:11:04.000Z

Changed files (1) +67 -9

learn-lang-diary/learn-lang-diary-part-ten-F.lyx +67 -9
……@@ -6934,7 +6934,8 @@ and
69346934
69356935\end_inset
69366936
6937
6937Again,
6938 this looks correct to me.
69386939\end_layout
69396940
69406941\begin_layout Paragraph*
……@@ -6946,7 +6947,7 @@ For
69466947\begin_inset Formula $e_{\;\mu}^{a}=\lambda\,\delta_{\mu}^{a}$
69476948\end_inset
69486949
6949 this works out to
6950 Claude tells me that this works out to
69506951\begin_inset Formula
69516952\[
69526953\omega_{\;\;\mu}^{ab}=\frac{1}{\lambda}\left(\delta_{\mu}^{a}\partial^{b}\lambda-\delta_{\mu}^{b}\partial^{a}\lambda\right)
……@@ -6965,27 +6966,51 @@ or
69656966
69666967\end_inset
69676968
6968so for
6969which smells OK.
6970\end_layout
6971
6972\begin_layout Standard
6973But now there is stumbling on notational issues.
6974 The greek letters are for coordinate spaces;
6975 the latin letters are for the tangent spaces.
6976 Lots of abuse of notation ensues.
6977\end_layout
6978
6979\begin_layout Standard
6980First,
6981
6982\begin_inset Formula $\partial^{a}=e^{a\mu}\partial_{\mu}$
6983\end_inset
6984
6985 with
6986\begin_inset Formula $e^{a\mu}=\delta^{a\mu}/\lambda$
6987\end_inset
6988
6989.
6990 The calculation in greek indexes,
6991 for
69696992\begin_inset Formula $\lambda=2A/\left(1-r^{2}\right)$
69706993\end_inset
69716994
6972 we get
6995 gives
69736996\begin_inset Formula
69746997\[
6975\partial^{a}\lambda=\frac{4A}{\left(1-r^{2}\right)^{2}}r\partial^{a}r=\frac{\lambda^{2}}{A}r\partial^{a}r=\frac{\lambda^{2}}{A}x^{a}
6998\partial_{\mu}\lambda=\frac{4A}{\left(1-r^{2}\right)^{2}}r\partial_{\mu}r=\frac{\lambda^{2}}{A}r\partial_{\mu}r=\frac{\lambda^{2}}{A}x_{\mu}
69766999\]
69777000
69787001\end_inset
69797002
6980Equivalently:
7003So converting to latin:
69817004\begin_inset Formula
69827005\[
6983\partial_{\mu}\lambda=\frac{\lambda^{2}}{A}x_{\mu}
7006\partial^{a}\lambda=\frac{\lambda}{A}x^{a}
69847007\]
69857008
69867009\end_inset
69877010
6988and so as before,
7011and so now comes more confusion.
7012 Earlier,
7013 Claude claimed,
69897014 in Cartesian:
69907015\begin_inset Formula
69917016\[
……@@ -6994,7 +7019,16 @@ and so as before,
69947019
69957020\end_inset
69967021
7022but this is off by a factor of
7023\begin_inset Formula $\lambda$
7024\end_inset
69977025
7026 overall.
7027 Fuck me.
7028 It is better to avoid using expressions like this.
7029 I leave this here,
7030 for now,
7031 with a ***caution*** sticker on it.
69987032\end_layout
69997033
70007034\begin_layout Paragraph*
……@@ -7095,7 +7129,31 @@ e_{3} & =\frac{1}{\lambda r\sin\theta}\partial_{\phi}
70957129\end_inset
70967130
70977131The spin connection.
7098 No mixed time–space:
7132
7133\begin_inset Formula
7134\[
7135\omega^{ab}=\frac{1}{\lambda}\left(dx^{a}\,\partial^{b}\lambda-dx^{b}\,\partial^{a}\lambda\right)
7136\]
7137
7138\end_inset
7139
7140so for for
7141\begin_inset Formula $\lambda=2A/\left(1-r^{2}\right)$
7142\end_inset
7143
7144 we get
7145\begin_inset Formula $\partial^{2}\lambda=\partial^{3}\lambda=0$
7146\end_inset
7147
7148 and
7149\begin_inset Formula $\partial^{1}\lambda=\lambda^{-1}\partial_{1}\lambda=\lambda r/A$
7150\end_inset
7151
7152 and so ...
7153\end_layout
7154
7155\begin_layout Standard
7156No mixed time–space:
70997157\begin_inset Formula
71007158\begin{align*}
71017159\omega^{0i} & =0\\