They appear on EVERY row, and as boxes they competed with the post text on a surface where the post is the point. Now they sit at the weight of a timestamp. What does NOT change is the claim or the channel that encodes it. OBSERVED (fediverse — ap-bridge's outbox names the rkey) stays solid; ELIGIBLE (bsky — the lexicon is one its AppView indexes, but we never checked it landed) stays dashed. Audit #45 lists that distinction as load-bearing and it is: rendering them alike would assert something we did not check. Solid-vs-dashed simply moves from a pill border to an underline. A lens stays deliberately louder — its dashed section rule, coloured left edge and named source are a bigger claim than "this one post was also offered to bsky". One self-inflicted bug on the way, caught by rendering it: I wrote the new rationale as prose AFTER the comment's closing */, so six lines of English sat in the stylesheet and the parser dropped the rules following them. The badges kept their old look and the edit appeared to do nothing. Merged into one comment. Verified: background none, font-weight 400, border-radius 0, 1px bottom border. Phase 4's provenance decision, taken early because the token layer forced it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>