OverviewFilesCommitsIssuesDocsReleasesPeers

basal-agent commits / d30024a

basal-agent: SYNTHESIS.md — Test B; optimal assortment is a trade-off
Adds rafcomp.c (Test B) to Part C and propagates its consequence. - New section: rung 1 chained into rung 4, catalytic output read off an emergent maxRAF instead of a supplied per-unit fold map. T2 beats the random-subset baseline 6/6 (~36x at the top cell); T3 the closure-blind control sits at 0.00-0.01 everywhere; T4 the predicted REVERSAL — fission beats the propagule bottleneck 5 cells to 0, gap widening with compartment size. - Proven/open gains the composite finding: OPTIMAL ASSORTMENT IS A TRADE-OFF, NOT A MAXIMUM. Per-unit quality favours maximum variance (Test A); collective closure is destroyed by it (Test B). Same machinery, same controls, opposite directions, because the KIND of quality differs — and linkage.c is the mechanism that buys both at once, closing a loop with the 2->3 result. - Records the honest bounds: two rungs CO-PRESENT, not one producing the other; the reaction network is supplied as in rung1.c so what emerges is which subset closes; and Test B has not had the matched-realized-size correction Test A required, so the reversal holds at matched division THRESHOLD only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
d30024a0895d101030aef8646e76e3dd51072ee8
by plankatron <fleeky@gmail.com> · 2026-08-01T00:08:13.000Z

Changed files (1) +58 -2

SYNTHESIS.md +58 -2
……@@ -762,6 +762,54 @@ every obligate multicellular lineage are the same thing at different scales.
762762Recorded caveat: after widening the sweep to 9 sizes the program's printed small/large crossing
763763counts have wrong denominators; the matched-size table is the actual test and is unaffected.
764764
765### `rafcomp.c` — Test B: two rungs in one model, and Test A reverses
766
767`chemoton.c` derives compartment-level selection but still **supplies** φ as a per-unit
768fold→catalysis map. `rung1.c` separately shows autocatalytic sets self-organising from random
769chemistry. Test B chains them: catalytic output is the **size of the maxRAF of the reactions a
770compartment actually holds** — closure is *computed*, never assigned.
771
772**Why it might fail, which is the point.** φ is intrinsic to a unit, so assortment shuffles good
773units around without damaging them. RAF membership is a property of the **set** — a reaction is in
774the RAF only if its reactants are producible and it is catalysed within the set present. Splitting a
775compartment can therefore destroy the closure that made the parent productive even though every
776individual reaction survives. That collides head-on with Test A.
777
778| cat. density | div size | random baseline | **fission** | fis control | **propagule** | prop control |
779|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
780| 0.04 | 16 | 0.03 | **1.16** | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.00 |
781| 0.08 | 16 | 0.10 | **4.68** | 0.01 | 3.49 | 0.00 |
782| 0.12 | 16 | 0.13 | **4.71** | 0.01 | 3.52 | 0.00 |
783| 0.08 | 8 | 0.05 | 2.59 | 0.01 | 2.35 | 0.00 |
784
785**T1** RAFs form (mean maxRAF to 4.71). **T2** coupled beats the random-subset baseline in **6/6**
786cells, ~36× at the top cell. **T3** the closure-blind control sits at **0.00–0.01 everywhere** —
787without selection on closure, compartments hold essentially no RAF at all. **T4, the reversal:
788fission beats the propagule bottleneck 5 cells to 0**, with the gap widening as compartments grow
789(~0.2 at div size 8, ~1.2 at 16) — expected, since at size 8 compartments are small enough that both
790modes assort similarly anyway.
791
792> **Test A: quality is per-unit → maximise variance, the bottleneck wins.
793> Test B: quality is collective → variance destroys it, fission wins.
794> Optimal assortment is a TRADE-OFF, not a maximum.**
795
796Both measured in the same machinery with the same controls, pointing opposite ways because the
797*kind* of quality differs. Neither result alone yields this.
798
799**And it closes a loop with `linkage.c`.** The tension has a resolution we had already shown emerges:
800**linkage**. Keeping co-functional parts physically together preserves combinations against
801assortment while still permitting variance *between* units. That is the chromosome argument (Maynard
802Smith & Szathmáry), arrived at here by chaining our own rungs rather than imported. The three results
803compose: collective function needs its parts kept together (2→3), parasite purging needs variance
804(Test A), and linkage buys both at once.
805
806**Honest bounds.** This is the first model in the arc with **two rungs at once** — an emergent RAF
807(rung 1) inside compartments that build, grow and select themselves (rung 4), the second selecting on
808the first. But they are **co-present and interacting, not one producing the other**: the self-building
809chain stays open. And the reaction network is supplied exactly as in `rung1.c` — what emerges is
810*which subset closes*, not the chemistry. Test B has also not had the matched-realized-size
811correction that Test A required, so the reversal is established at matched division *threshold* only.
812
765813### Where Part C leaves rung 1→2
766814
767815**Narrowed to one thing.** The circle that stood since the 14-experiment arc — privatization needs
……@@ -813,6 +861,14 @@ transfer to 1→2 on its own — only Law 2 does.
813861- **Compartment-level selection need not be supplied** (`chemoton.c`) — coupling growth to the
814862 chemistry's own output generates it with no fitness-proportional sampling anywhere, reproducing the
815863 decreed version's size-threshold signature (PARTIAL: small 2/2, large 1/2). ✓
864- **Optimal assortment is a trade-off, not a maximum** (Test A vs Test B) — when catalytic quality is
865 per-unit, maximising variance wins (propagule beats fission); when it is a collective closure
866 property, variance destroys the closure and fission wins (5 cells to 0). The two point opposite ways
867 in the same machinery because the *kind* of quality differs, and `linkage.c` is the mechanism that
868 buys both at once. ✓
869- **Compartment selection survives collective quality** (`rafcomp.c`) — maxRAF 4.71 vs a random-subset
870 baseline of 0.13, with the closure-blind control at 0.00–0.01. First model in the arc holding two
871 rungs at once, though co-present rather than one producing the other. ✓
816872- **Assortment variance, not compartment size, is the operative variable** (`chemoton.c` Test A) —
817873 a single-unit propagule beats a 50/50 split by +1.14 φ at *matched realized size*, with the
818874 advantage exactly zero where the two modes coincide (size ≤3) and peaking at +2.98 where they
……@@ -849,12 +905,12 @@ Part A: `stream.c` `sns.c` `mess3.c` `learn.c` `critical.c` `competitive.c` `da-
849905Part B: `lawspace.c` `rung1.c` `rung2.c` `rung3.c` `evoworld.c` `rung34.c` `rung45.c` `bridge.c`
850906`rung45dup.c` `flagella.c` `gard.c` `gardenv.c` `digigard.c` `template.c` `templceil.c` `spatial.c` `window.c` `polymer.c` `ribozyme.c` `bridges.c` `coemerge.c` `integrated.c`.
851907Part C (boundary kind, 2026-07-31): `coupling.c` `partition.c` `signal.c` `linkage.c`
852`byproduct.c` `chemoton.c`;
908`byproduct.c` `chemoton.c` `rafcomp.c`;
853909Φ_r probes `phir.h` (shared estimator) `ribophi.c` `rung34phi.c` `gardphi.c`.
854910Agent line: `belief_field_agent.c` `agent_learn.c`.
855911`src/`: original Phase-1 filesystem active-perception agent (active > random search).
856912
857913Per-experiment write-ups: `coupling.md` `partition.md` `signal.md` `byproduct.md` `chemoton.md`
858`ribophi.md` `rung34phi.md` `gardphi.md`.
914`rafcomp.md` `ribophi.md` `rung34phi.md` `gardphi.md`.
859915
860916Each `*.c` is standalone: `cc -O2 -std=c11 -o X X.c -lm && ./X`.